| 
Lisa
Dubay, Sc.M. and Genevieve M. Kenney, Ph.D.
Lisa
Dubay and Genevieve Kenney are principal research associates at
The Urban Institute in Washington, D.C. Lisa Dubay is a health services
researcher with more than 20 years of public health experience.
Genevieve Kenney is a health economist with more than twenty years
of experience conducting research. Over the course of two HCFO grants,
Dubay and Kenney have examined the ways in which policy changes
in the Medicaid program have affected prenatal care and birth outcomes.
In
their first HCFO study, and with more recent data in their second
study, Dubay and Kenney examined whether mandating Medicaid expansions
at the national level and allowing states to expand eligibility
beyond the mandates increases access to prenatal care and improves
birth outcomes. They found t hat
the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women led to broad improvements
in the prenatal care delivery system, such as the streamlining of
the Medicaid eligibility determination process, increased provider
payments, an infusion of federal dollars into the system, and an
expansion in the capacity of the system. The expansions also resulted
in a substantial increase in Medicaid-covered births and a reduction
in uninsurance among low-income pregnant women, leading to significant
improvements in the timely initiation of prenatal care. However,
few improvements in birth outcomes were observed.
“This
study illustrates that targeted expansions in the Medicaid program
can reduce the rate of uninsurance without substantial substitution
of public for private coverage and can improve access to care for
low-income populations,” says Dubay. “Clearly such expansions
in coverage are a necessary step towards improving the health of
low-income populations.” However, the emerging lesson from
the Medicaid expansions is that increased access to primary care
is not sufficient, she says, if the goal is to narrow the gap in
newborn health between low and higher-income populations.
In
a second project, Dubay and Kenney built on the previously funded
project to continue analyses at the national level, while also performing
state-specific analyses (Ohio and Missouri) to examine the direct
impacts of different managed care arrangements and financial risk
structures on prenatal care use and birth outcomes. This research
was featured during a recent HCFO Cyber
Seminar.
Their
research indicated that the effects of Medicaid managed care on
prenatal care were mixed, depending on state-specific environments.
“We learned that managed care and coverage expansions related
to pregnancy are not a panacea,” says Kenney. “Managed
care and other interventions occurring during the prenatal care
period may have only a limited impact because so many women do not
become eligible for or enroll in Medicaid until after they are pregnant.”
Kenny believes that policymakers will have to look beyond managed
care if they are to identify strategies that will improve birth
outcomes for women covered by Medicaid.
Dubay
and Kenney found no evidence of improvements in birth outcomes,
and they could not rule out the possibility that Medicaid managed
care had an adverse effect on outcomes in some states. In Ohio and
Missouri, managed care was associated with reductions in smoking
during pregnancy (impacts on smoking during pregnancy were not assessed
in the national analysis). However, in both cases, rates of smoking
among Medicaid women remained high.
Dubay
and Kenney’s research portfolio has primarily focused on the
effects of public policies on access and coverage for low-income
populations. As co-directors of The Urban Institute’s multi-year
evaluation of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program
(SCHIP), they are examining a range of issues, including family
coverage policies and SCHIP financing; participation in Medicaid
and SCHIP and barriers to enrollment; access and use differentials
among low-income children; effects on children of family coverage
expansions; and impacts of SCHIP expansions on insurance coverage,
crowd-out, and access to care.
Dubay
is currently a doctoral student at the Johns Hopkins University’s
Bloomberg School of Public Health. She received an Sc.M. in health
policy and management from the Harvard School of Public Health and
a B.A. from Tufts University.
Kenney
received a Ph.D. in economics and an M.A. in statistics from the
University of Michigan. She earned a B.A. from Smith College.
Articles
and Reports from HCFO-Funded Projects.
Ellwood,
M. and G. Kenney. “Medicaid and Pregnant Women: Who Is Getting
Covered and When?” Health Care Financing Review,
Vol. 17, No. 2, Winter 1995.
Dubay,
L. et al. “Local Responses to Medicaid Expansions to Pregnant
Women,” Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 73, No. 4, Winter
1995, pp. 535-64.
Norton,
S. et al. “Medicaid Coverage of Maternity Care for Aliens
in California,” Family Planning Perspectives, Vol.
28, No. 3, May/June 1996.
Dubay,
L. and G. Kenney. “Did the Medicaid Expansions for Pregnant
Women Crowd-out Private Insurance?” Health Affairs,
Vol. 16, No. 1, January/February 1997.
Dubay,
L. et al. “Changes in Prenatal Care Timing and Low Birth Weight
by Race and Socioeconomic Status: Implications for Medicaid Expansions
for Pregnant Women,” Heath Services Research, June
2001.
Kenney,
G. and L. Dubay. “National Impacts of the Medicaid Expansions
for Pregnant Women,” Urban Institute Working Paper,
June 1997.
Kaestner,
R. et al. “Medicaid Managed Care and Infant Health: A National
Evaluation,” National Bureau of Economic Research, May 2002.
Sommers,
A. et al. “The Implementation of Mandatory Medicaid Managed
Care in Missouri: Impacts for Pregnant Women and Infants,”
draft manuscript, January 2003.
Howell,
E. et al. “The Impact of Medicaid Managed Care on Pregnant
Women in Ohio: A Cohort Analysis,” Health Services Research,
forthcoming.
Kenney,
G. et al. “Moving to Mandatory Medicaid Managed Care in Ohio:
Impacts for Pregnant Women and Infants,” draft manuscript,
March 2003.
Howell,
E. and A. Sommers. “The Implementation of Medicaid Managed
Care for Pregnant Women in Ohio: A Case Study,” The Urban
Institute, July 14, 2003. Available at: www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410823.
|